Georgia’s Vice Speaker of Parliament, Gia Volski, on Wednesday defended the Georgian Dream authorities against what he describes as unfair criticism regarding the adoption of the foreign influence transparency law earlier this year. He claimed the law, “which aims to ensure the transparency of domestic NGOs”, raised questions about the goals of those opposing the legislation.
In his press comments, Volski highlighted a discrepancy in the standards applied to Georgia compared to other countries. “There is no answer from our partners as to why much stricter laws in the US, Canada, Great Britain, and EU member states are considered good for them but bad for Georgia. What is the difference?” he asked.
The MP claimed transparency was essential, “especially as NGOs have positioned themselves at the forefront of the radical opposition, actively criticizing the government and even calling for its resignation and a coup”.
“Therefore, the state has decided that the funds received by NGOs should be transparent to the public, without limiting their activities. The public should know who to vote for during elections – those planning a coup and destabilization, or a government that demonstrates stability and economic development,” he said.
Volski’s comments come amid ongoing debates and criticism from various international and local bodies and allies regarding the Georgian government’s move to implement the foreign influence transparency law. Critics argue that such laws could potentially suppress civil society and hinder the activities of NGOs, which they say play a crucial role in fostering democracy and holding the government accountable.
